Förvrängelse, förfalskning och plagiering är de vanliga misstänkta om vetenskaplig oredlighet. Vanligare är mindre former av olämpligt uppträdande, även känd som “slarviga vetenskap”. Denna kurs belyser de vanligaste oredlighet i forskningen och deras inverkan. Syftet är att öka medvetenheten och främja ansvarsfullt genomförande av forskning bland unga forskare.

  • Kärnvärden från god vetenskaplig praxis
  • Kända exempel på Fabrication, förfalskning och plagiering
  • Andra former av forskningsintegritet brott
  • Effekterna och konsekvenserna av tvivelaktiga forskningsmetoder
  • Faktorer som kan leda till forskningsfusk
  • Riktlinjer för ansvarsfullt genomförande av forskning

Mer information hittas på vr.se/etik/oredlighetiforskningen och retractionwatch.com.


The first webinar of the Open Science MOOC focused on Module 5: Open Research Software and Open Source and was pesented by our team colleague André Maia Chagas. View the slides of this presentation at zenodo.org/record/3242340 Cite as: Maia Chagas, Andre. (2019, June). Bringing science to the 21st Century: Open Source tools for better research. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3242340 Online Course Take the free Open Science MOOC online course: Module 5: Open Research ...
Read More
In an attempt to secure and protect unbiased Open Science in Europe our team member, palaeontologist and Open Access activist Jon Tennant has taken another stand against Elsevier. Elsevier is the biggest and most influential scientific publisher and at the same time probably the most profitable business worldwide. To get an overview of the cascade of events and some background on the story, read the following articles: Tennant J (June 28, 2018), Elsevier ...
Read More
On his blog Green Tea and Velociraptors our team colleague Jon Tennant questions the ethics of the widely practiced copyright transfer from authors of peer reviewed articles that are based mostly on public funding to commercial publishers.  The following is an excerpt from Jon's original blog post. […] Typically, the process of copyright transfer for research articles happens something like this:
  • Researchers submit a manuscript to a journal for peer review.
  • ...
    Read More
How to make your research Open Access - infographic
The infographic shows how to achieve 100% Open Access for free and legally; available on figshare ...
Read More
Good Manufacturing Practice icons
For a 2-day course on Good Manufacturing Practice earlier this week, I prepared the following presentation. The lecture started with a recap of Good Scientific Practice, followed by Good Laboratory Practice as prerequisites for reliable and transparent manufacturing in pharmaceutical, medicinal, food and agricultural industries. Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) 2day course from Johanna Havemann Insights and feedback from the participants ranged from "Why didn't we have this lecture before ...
Read More
Originally published in naturejobs. The March for Science turned a spotlight on the importance of research. But it won’t have a lasting effect unless we improve science communication, says Judith Reichel. On Saturday, April 22nd, myself and an estimated 11,000 other science supporters marched in Berlin. The event was part of the global “March for Science” that took place in over 600 cities worldwide. While the March here and everywhere ...
Read More
In his blog Green Tea and VelociraptorsJon Tennant describes his approach to writing a peer review.  […] I remember the first time I got a review request in the second year of my PhD. An Editor emails you out of the blue, and asks you to provide your expert commentary on research by your colleagues. EXPERT COMMENTARY. BUT I’M NO EXPERT. PANIC. Well, you are an expert to some degree. Which is why ...
Read More