- Comparing different types of peer review
- Benefits and flaws
- The process
- Critical reading of a manuscript
- The peer review debate: (not only) a quest for more transparency in the process
- What does it take to be a referee?
References
Tennant JP, Dugan JM, Graziotin D et al. A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 2; referees: 2 approved with reservations]. F1000Research 2017, 6:1151 (doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12037.2)
A couple of days ago on May 15th in Leipzig, Germany at the Mx Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (MPI-EVA), Corina Logan had invited Denis Bourguet and Thomas Guillemaud from Peer Community In to give a seminar on their non-profit service to science: A researcher-run solution to improving science and ...
Read More
Read More
In his blog Green Tea and Velociraptors, describes his approach to writing a peer review. […] I remember the first time I got a review request in the second year of my PhD. An Editor emails you out of the blue, and asks you to provide your expert commentary on research ...
Read More
Read More
Our short answer is "YES". Do you need arguments in favor of Open Access (OA) in Research? Here you go: More citations per article OA articles are available free of charge not only to scientists all around the globe, but also to journalists, policy makers, economists and the general public ...
Read More
Read More